<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Losing Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://breakthroughgen.org/2009/06/13/a-losing-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://breakthroughgen.org/2009/06/13/a-losing-strategy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:50:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Putting Clean Energy at the Center: A Context-independent Opportunity for Progress &#171; Breakthrough Generation</title>
		<link>http://breakthroughgen.org/2009/06/13/a-losing-strategy/#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>Putting Clean Energy at the Center: A Context-independent Opportunity for Progress &#171; Breakthrough Generation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://breakthroughgen.org/?p=1106#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>[...] need is to develop the “political will” to act on the science. Such people, like Ken Ward, who I responded to on Friday, argue that if we simply “take to the streets” with the facts and tell all who will listen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] need is to develop the “political will” to act on the science. Such people, like Ken Ward, who I responded to on Friday, argue that if we simply “take to the streets” with the facts and tell all who will listen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Margolis</title>
		<link>http://breakthroughgen.org/2009/06/13/a-losing-strategy/#comment-1142</link>
		<dc:creator>R Margolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 07:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://breakthroughgen.org/?p=1106#comment-1142</guid>
		<description>I am not sure the subsidy issue is as important as the physics and chemistry.  One gallon of gasolene contains the energy of about 14 sticks of dynamite.  Fossil fuels pack a lot of energy in a small volume and are relatively abundant.  Even with a shift in subsidies, technological breakthroughs (e.g., better energy storage) are required to make low carbon energy competitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure the subsidy issue is as important as the physics and chemistry.  One gallon of gasolene contains the energy of about 14 sticks of dynamite.  Fossil fuels pack a lot of energy in a small volume and are relatively abundant.  Even with a shift in subsidies, technological breakthroughs (e.g., better energy storage) are required to make low carbon energy competitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: climatesight</title>
		<link>http://breakthroughgen.org/2009/06/13/a-losing-strategy/#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>climatesight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://breakthroughgen.org/?p=1106#comment-1141</guid>
		<description>A great quote I heard in the 11th Hour went something like, &quot;If we remove the subsidies on oil, and subsidized clean energy instead; if dirty energies and clean energies are equal in price, on an equal playing field; I have no doubt that the clean energies will win.&quot;

Once there are alternatives we will be able to make this change, without economic harm. Banning fossil fuels overnight, without any available alternatives, will only make a lot of people mad. We need another way to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great quote I heard in the 11th Hour went something like, &#8220;If we remove the subsidies on oil, and subsidized clean energy instead; if dirty energies and clean energies are equal in price, on an equal playing field; I have no doubt that the clean energies will win.&#8221;</p>
<p>Once there are alternatives we will be able to make this change, without economic harm. Banning fossil fuels overnight, without any available alternatives, will only make a lot of people mad. We need another way to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
